No Comment »

Deas said:
Bill, one thing that freaked me out a while back is kind of related to this obliquely. One reason for ALTs to be wary of posting photos of their students without permission (similar to needing a media waiver in the states) is that there are creeps out there who photoshop young girls’ faces into child pornography. This begs the question - if a computer generated it from scratch, is it still child pornography? In other words, if the child is not real, is it still child pornography? Also, if they take a picture of an 18 year old and then photoshop her to look younger (a very common practice for celebrities just taken to a different level), is that still child pornography? CG. Retrogressive porn. This is a really fuzzy subject. I thought I’d tangentially mention it - because I for one am kind of bothered by U-15s and T-Back idols. In my book, it’s closer to child pornography than anything else. My two cents.
- 3 May 2007 at 2:56 pm
ENKPU said:
CALM DOWN. DON´T BE JEALOUS OF THE YOUNG PRINCESSES.
THEY ARE GODS GIFT, WITH OR WITHOUT CLOTHES ON. ENJOY LIFE, AND THE NICE ASIAN LITTLE GIRLS IN THEIR POSES. BESIDES, LET THEM MAKE SOME GOOD MONEY NOW, FOR THEIR STUDIES LATER IN LIFE, WHEN THEY WON´T BE SO CUTE AND PRETTY. ITS ONLY A FEW YEAR SPAN, WHEN THEY´RE IN THEIR PRIME STAGE AS NUBILE YOUNG GIRLS, FLAWLESS BEAUTY.
- 18 December 2007 at 6:59 pm
Fred said:
I agree with Andrea and I am starting a website just for girls like yourself. So if you are interested please email me and we can go over the basics. Fwdudley73@yahoo.com
- 2 January 2008 at 8:19 am
summer said:
fred email me summerbabi@rock.com plezeee!!!
- 20 January 2008 at 5:46 pm
marie thérèse said:
beurk !!!
- 18 January 2009 at 7:42 pm

Leave a comment!

You must be logged in to post a comment.